I’m starting to get back into a reading habit again, after a bit of a hiatus during which all I could manage were a couple crime thrillers, which are great for diversion but don't offer much meat for discussion. I’m not as discriminating a reader as perhaps I should be. I like sugary candy, too.
I have, however, started and left unfinished a number of interesting books I’d like to go back to. I went to the library about a month ago – shortly before my husband came home - and left with a big ambitious stack of books. A couple were about Afghanistan –
Before the Prophet by Lesley Hazleton, which tells about the split between the Sunni and Shiite in the style of a storyteller. The other was
In Afghanistan: Two Hundred Years of British, Russian, and American Occupation by David Loyn, a British journalist, which was about all these failed attempts to subdue the country. The first I’m intending to read eventually; the second had too many in-depth details about battles and politics for me to get my mind around at the moment. My husband’s marine friend read it and was convinced it held the key to the end of the American engagement in Afghanistan.
****
Then there were novels I turned in but didn't read –
The Children’s Book by A.S. Byatt. I loved
Possession and liked
Still Life and
Angels and Insects, but the 500 pages of
The Children’s Book was just too imposing. Maybe someday in a summer. Even
The Red Pyramid – the new Rick Riordan middle grade book I meant to read but never got around to and couldn’t renew - was too much.The three older boys devoured it. I hope it wasn’t damaging to their psyches. Neither could I finish
The Enchanted Castle by Edith Nesbit or get any of the kids to read it. I think I would’ve loved this book at age 10, but I just couldn’t get past the third chapter, and now with books like
The Red Pyramid, The Enchanted Castle just seems quaint and not thrilling at all.
****
Next up were a couple spiritual books
: A Map of Life by F. J. Sheed and
A Thomas Merton Reader, both of which I want to finish, but need to own. The second is a book for dipping into, not reading straight through, while the first I set down and just never picked back up. I’m way behind in spiritual reading, which I guess could explain the spinning wheels effect in my life. Prayer and
lectio divina have suffered in these days of busyness. Usually when I make time for them, the rest of my time is used more wisely. I need a little Lent.
*****
Now I remember that is was a memoir to pick up that led to the trip to the library – Mary Karr’s
Liar’s Club which I finished and commented a little on in
Reading for Believers. Then I picked up
Julia and Julie which I keep reading out of fascination (and wrote about, but haven't posted). Such a different life than mine. Not a life that I want. Not a book that I really wanted to spend time with but one I could put down because it diverted my attention by giving me things to complain about, ie: Look at the way she treats her husband! Listen to the bad advice she gives her friend! Read how many times she mentions she married young but she’s trying to convince everyone that she’s still cool!
But I have to admire her persistence in actually making these recipes. Did she actually make and then really eat calf foot gelee? Fascinating. Lately, I have been struggling with committing to projects that take passion and perseverance, so I’m envying those who witness those characteristics.
******
Another memoir of a sort that I finally finished was our read aloud of
Little House on the Prairie. We haven’t had a lot of read aloud time lately, and when I started this book I got a lot of flack from the older boys and from my 8 yr old daughter. In fact part of the reason I was reading it was because she refused to read it herself. Can this be my child?! So for the first few nights, no one wanted to listen. But I kept reading over their wrestling, and finally, about the time malaria struck the families in the creek bottom, I started to get some kids interested. And by the time the Indians came in the house, everyone was paying attention. And by the time the Ingalls were driving away from their snug little house I was in tears, still emotionally drained by the long trail of Indians heading west and the heartbreak of the family having to pull up their stakes again.
Poor Ma. I totally felt her pain when she lifts up her hands and sits down after Pa tells her they are leaving. But then to her sighing, “A whole year gone, Charles,” Pa answers cheerfully, “What’s a year amount to? We have all the time there is.” And he plays his fiddle and sings, and a year of hard work becomes a good memory and a great little book.
*******
Finally some poetry, little bites of beauty which I did manage to digest:
Resurrection by Nicole Cooley was not what I thought it was going to be. A bit of a man-hater.
Poems of the Vieux Carre by former New Orleans poet laureate Amy Boudreau was hugely entertaining. It was a tour guide to the city written in quatrains. Perfect for our 4 trips to NO over the last month.
When I picked up these two books and
The Best American Poetry of 2008, I was looking for poetry by Mary Karr, and this book was the only one that came up on the card catalog. Although it only had one of her poems, focusing on the collection was an indulgence that pulled me back into reading something that required a little audience participation. I read a bit here and there while subbing last week, and then reread some of the poems after reading what the authors had said about them in the back of the book. I didn’t realize at first that the descriptions were back there, and found them entertaining and enlightening. Is it a weaknes in the poem or in the reader if you appreciate a poem more after reading the notes? A couple I appreciated less after reading the bloated remarks of the poets.
A couple favorites: (does this count as a
Poetry Friday post?)
Robert Bly’s “Wanting Sumptuous Heavens” (a r
amage, I learned from the notes)
No one grumbles among the oyster clans,
And lobsters play their bone guitars all summer.
Only we, with our opposable thumbs, want
Heaven to be, and God to come, again.
There is no end to our grumbling; we want
Comfortable earth and sumptuous Heaven.
But the heron standing on one leg in the bog
Drinks his dark rum all day, and is content.
Nice read aloud for the contented um sounds.
And J.D. McClatchy’s “Resignation”
I like trees because they seem more resigned to
the way they have to live than other things do.
-Willa Cather
Here the oak and silver breasted birches
Stand in their sweet familiarity
While underground, as in a black mirror,
They have concealed their tangled grievances,
Identical to the branching calm above
But there ensnared, each with the others’ hold
On what gives life to which is brutal enough.
Still, in the air, none tries to keep company
Or change its fortune. They seem to lean
On the light, unconcerned with what the world
Makes of their decencies, and will not sow
A jealous purchase on their length of days,
To never having been loved as they wanted
Or deserved, to anyone’s sudden infatuation
Gouged into their sides, to all they are forced
To shelter and to hide, they have resigned themselves.
- both of these were from T
he New Yorker
A couple other lines I noted: from Kathryn Starbuck’s “The Shoe” a poem she said she forgot she wrote and submitted:
“… I made braids out of dead funeral
flowers to border the rooms where
once he breathed and took on the heavy
chores, gladly, of loving me. I sprinkled
one teaspoon of his ashes on our bereft bed
and slept with them. They scourged my body.
But when that single shoe, the mate I thought
had got sent off with its partner, showed up
today, alone, crouching behind the couch, alive
with Effie’s opulent Turkish angora fur, I knew
solace was something I could neither seek nor
find. Oh beloved! I know I am an old woman
But I cannot live in your shoe."
-from the
Harvard Review
And from Lee Upton’s “Thomas Hardy”
“Too late, he says. But it’s never too late
for the poetry of regret.”
- first published in
Barrow Street
****
Finally a note I copied out of the forward to
My Antonia by Kathleen Norris from an essay called “The Demands of Art” that Cather wrote in 1895, 17 yrs before she published her first novel:
“When one comes to write, all that you have been taught leaves you, all that you have stolen lies discovered. You are then a translator, without a lexicon, without notes…. You have then to give voice to the hearts of men, and you can do it only so far as you have known them, loved them. It is a solemn and terrible thing to write a novel.”
Blogs are much easier. Go to
Conversiondiary for more reads.