A slow month for reading and blogging. Life intervenes – home schooling, teaching the literature class, shuttling kids to events. I thought with my husband gone for two weeks I’d get more reading done, but he returns soon, hurrah, and I haven’t finished a novel. Lenten reading has taken precedence: rereading Benedictus in the morning; evening prayer, scripture, and poetry in the evening.
Eventually, I'm going to pick out another book to read for Lent, but for now the rest of my reading has been for class, and it has been a pleasure. Trifles by Susan Glaspell was popular, after Sophocles and Shakespeare. I never read this play as student, and I suspect it has been added to anthologies to provide gender diversity in the drama section. It’s a short play by a woman about women’s issues: a repressed wife has strangled her husband, but her two neighbors conceal evidence. The essays I scanned about it focus on the silencing of Mrs. Wright and the perceptiveness of the women characters. All of the action takes place in the kitchen, and it’s the neighbor women, not the sheriff and county attorney, who notice the details that provide the missing motive to a murder.
Although the play does focus on the relationships between the women, it’s too bad if it is pegged as a gender-studies piece. The idea that it’s the little things, the trifles, that define us, that form our character, applies generally. The way we keep house – or farm, what we buy, or refuse to buy, the mementoes we hold on to, all reveal something about what we think is important, even if in themselves they seem inconsequential.
Also overlooked in some of the commentary that I read is the guilt that Mrs. Hale feels for not having visited Mrs. Wright in over a year because her house isn’t cheerful. If anything, it’s this failure, not her loyalty to her sex,that prevents her from condemning Mrs. Wright for murdering her husband. It’s this guilt that is the most powerful part of the play for me. How many times have I refused to look out for a neighbor in need? Neglected to call a friend because I was too busy? Avoided the talker at church because I wanted to get going?
It’s a guilt that convicts.
************
I also recently finished Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese and was happy to have liked it so well, since it took a good chunk of time to read, and since I bought it for a book club that it arrived late for. Because it’s been a bestseller, I thought it might disappoint, but perhaps low expectations allowed me to enjoy it more.
It’s the story of twin brothers, born out of a brief relationship between an Indian nun and a British doctor, who grow up in Ethiopia, and eventually come to America. It had a multinational flavor and some interesting twists.
The mother of the boys dies in childbirth, and a female doctor from India raises them. Her goal is “to avoid the sheep life at all costs,” a phrase that makes me want both to itch and applaud. She ends up dedicating her life to these boys and a missionary hospital. It is a small life, but the details, the trifles, are colorful.
Another bit that gave me pause was the advice from the boys’ father-figure, as he prepares to die. He tells the son who narrates a story about a pair of slippers that kept coming back to the owner, who was trying to throw them out. The moral of the story is this: “I hope one day you see this as clearly as I did in Kerchele. The key to your happiness is to own your slippers, own who you are, own how you look, own your family, own the talents you have, and own the ones you don’t. If you keep saying your slippers aren’t yours, then you’ll die searching, you’ll die bitter, always feeling you were promised more. Not only our actions, but also our omissions, become our destiny.”
In a way, this quote seems to contradict the one from Pope Benedict I posted a few days ago about how seeking success and fulfillment only for ourselves, makes us repugnant. It is only in our ability to love others, to look outward, that we avoid bitterness and disillusion. But in a way, they seem to parallel each other. If we try to escape our identity, our roots, our appearance and abilities, we deny the vocation God gave us. We can’t compare ourselves to others, or seek to escape our responsibilities.
The way it plays out in the book involves a series of pardons. The omissions are acts of forgiveness, which eventually are extended, so that book ends with a satisfying tying up of loose ends. It’s a book that may not linger long past its bestseller shelf life, but I don’t regret the time I spent reading it.
*****
Neither was the time spent scanning The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick a bad half hour. The book is thick, but mostly pictures. My older boys had read it a few years ago, but in honor of the new movie recently released, it was front and center at the library, so the youngers breezed through it. I read it after I realized my seven-year-old wasn’t quite grasping everything. It requires some inferences to be made that he wasn’t quite getting. He’s not a strong reader yet, but he caught most of the main idea, and he enjoyed it, so I was happy to indulge his desire to see the movie, which of course loses some of the magic of the book. On the other hand, it captures the magic of the silent films better that the book does. A trade-off. I’m just pleased that all the kids can sit and watch the same movie about the will to create without complaining about it being a baby movie, or a girl movie, or a boy movie, or a boring movie, or a violent movie. Enjoyed by all.