Watched Richard Attenborough’s
Gandhi Saturday night with the kids – a remedy to letting them watch
Labyrinth the previous night. Felt like I had to repair their brains so that such bad acting and such scary dancing as that of David Bowie’s in
Labyrinth wouldn’t be imbedded in their imaginations. (Too late!) What were Jim Henson and George Lucas thinking? Other than the Magic Dance/Baby with the Voodoo song, we couldn’t make out any of the lyrics – was it a bad recording or just plain bad? But of course, the kids LOVED the Bog of Eternal Stench. And just to say something charitable, some of the Muppets were memorable. I thought I remembered liking this movie when I saw it when it came out in 1986. Why didn’t someone nix the David Bowie cameo and use a Muppet for the Goblin King? Then it would have been a forgettable Muppet movie; instead, it’s an odd, scary film that I couldn’t believe we wasted almost two hours watching.
You can’t even compare the three hour
Gandhi with
Labyrinth, except that we watched them on consecutive nights. Well made, fabulously acted, it only lacked a good stereo recorded sound. Or perhaps it was hard to hear because the kids kept asking me what was going on, which I didn’t always know. It was an excellent lesson in history and principles, patience and dedication, and the blindness of the masses to the potential for peace through self-control. Not that we all have the will of Gandhi to deny ourselves of consolations and comforts, but if only we could stifle our desires for revenge, for power, for following the mob.
The movie follows Gandhi through his first attempts at civil disobedience in South Africa, to his gradual awakening to the possibilities of nonviolent resistence and the even more gradual loosening of the British grip on India. The resolution of his nonviolent revolutions took years. It is a miracle that the people continued to follow him.
Sadly, the victory for nonviolence was short-lived, once the civil war between Pakistan and India began. How Gandhi felt about the warring between Pakistan and India after he had worked so hard for home rule is incomprehensible. What would he think about the situation there now?
The temptation is to think that “those people” have a violent religion or will never be free from tribal disagreements. But there are plenty of small wars going on in our communities and households that are certainly not undertaken in a spirit of peaceful resistance. And perhaps on a smaller scale, but still destructive, are those wars in our hearts that prevent us from following our convictions and our beliefs. Perhaps I was so affected by this film because I feel that I have drifted so far from the ideals of my young adulthood, and Gandhi’s growth in conviction and practice is both an inspiration and a condemnation.
I’m not sure how much this movie affected the kids, but they begged to finish watching it after the intermission, even though they complained when I put the movie in. (Why don’t you ever get any good movies, Mom? my 12 yr old wanted to know. I’ll take that as a compliment.) They were impressed that the movie was made in 1982, as it feels so contemporary (especially compared to Labyrinth, whose 80’s provenance is obvious). Ben Kingsley looks just like Gandhi, and is completely convincing. You couldn’t tell if the newsreel clips were real or made for the movie. There were scenes of distressing violence, perhaps most especially the massacre at Amritsar, but they weren’t gratuitous - their tragic nature was clear.
My own encounter with Gandhi took place when I was about the age of my olders, shortly after the time the movie came out, when I was in 6th grade. I can’t remember if I chose or was assigned to present a research project for Social Studies on him, but it was one of the first times I remember getting drawn completely into research, enjoying the discovery, the process of becoming familiar with a person from history, looking for resources in the open library at our middle school.
Come to think of it, that social studies class had several big projects: learning hieroglyphics, a mock trial of historical characters, making a film strip. Out of my few memories of middle school, a large amount come from that class, which was taught by a heavyset woman with brilliant red hair. She was large enough that no one knew she was pregnant until we found out the next fall that she had a baby in the summer. Perhaps pregnancy explains why she sat in state in the front of the class, rarely left her stool behind the podium, and spoke with sardonic humor about history and current events. I don’t remember her lecturing much, but she was very good at coming up with projects. And now all these years later, I realize in retrospect what a good teacher she was. Never a favorite, but able to encourage critical thinking from pre-pubescent middle schoolers.
(Unlike the math teacher, a tall thin, beak nosed woman, who told me not to ask questions when I asked why were using letters in math. I was prejudiced against math until 12th grade, when another memorable teacher revealed the beauty of the unit circle. But that’s another topic.)